Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning – forutsetninger, muligheter og begrensninger
- 1.
Malterud K. The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet 2001; 358: 397 – 400.
- 2.
Horton R. The interpretive turn. Lancet 1995; 346: 3.
- 3.
Jones R. Why do qualitative research? It should begin to close the gap between the sciences of discovery and implementation. BMJ 1995; 311: 2.
- 4.
Johansson E, Hamberg K, Westman G, Lindgren G. The meanings of pain: an exploration of women’s descriptions of symptoms. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 1791 – 802.
- 5.
Gandhi IG, Parle JV, Greenfield SM, Gould S. A qualitative investigation into why patients change their GPs. Fam Pract 1997; 14: 49 – 57.
- 6.
Malterud K. Allmennpraktikerens møte med kvinnelige pasienter. Oslo: TANO, 1990.
- 7.
Dahlgren LO, Diwan VK, Tomson G, Wahlstrom R. On the variation in conceptions among primary care physicians regarding hypercholesterolemia: a phenomenographic analysis. Scand J Prim Health Care 1992; 10: 316 – 20.
- 8.
Bjarås G. The need of leadership for motivation of participants in a community intervention programme. Scand J Soc Med 1991; 19: 190 – 8.
- 9.
Larsen M, Oldeide CC, Malterud K. Not so bad after all... Women’s experiences of pelvic examinations. Fam Pract 1997; 14: 148 – 52.
- 10.
Malterud K. Action research – a strategy for evaluation of medical interventions. Fam Pract 1995; 12: 476 – 81.
- 11.
Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1985.
- 12.
Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook. 2. utg. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
- 13.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, red. Handbook for qualitative research. 2. utg. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000.
- 14.
Malterud K. Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning – en innføring. Oslo: TANO, 1996.
- 15.
Malterud K. Shared understanding of the qualitative research process – guidelines for the medical researcher. Fam Pract 1993; 10: 201 – 6.
- 16.
Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001; 358: 483 – 8.
- 17.
Burkett GL, Godkin MA. Qualitative research in family medicine. J Fam Pract 1983; 16: 625 – 6.
- 18.
Kvale S. InterViews. An introduction to qualitative research writing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996.
- 19.
Mays N, Pope C. Quality in qualitative health research. I: Pope CP, Mays N, red. Qualitative research in health care. 2. utg. London: BMJ Books, 2000: 89 – 101.
- 20.
Skelton AM, Murphy EA, Murphy RJL, O’Dowd TC. General practitioner perceptions of low back patients. Fam Pract 1995; 12: 44 – 8.
- 21.
Gardner K, Chapple A. Barriers to referral in patients with angina: qualitative study. BMJ 1999; 319: 418 – 21.
- 22.
Söderlund A, Skoge AM, Malterud K. «I could not lift my arm holding the fork...» Living with chronic fatigue syndrome. Scand J Prim Health Care 2000; 18: 165 – 9.
- 23.
Morgan DL, red. Successful focus groups. Advancing the state of the art. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1993.
- 24.
Krueger RA. Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
- 25.
Kitzinger J. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995; 311: 299 – 302.
- 26.
Arborelius E, Bremberg S, Timpka T. What is going on when the general practitioner doesn’t grasp the situation? Fam Pract 1991; 8: 3 – 9.
- 27.
Nessa J. From a medical consultation to a written text. Scand J Prim Health Care 1995; 13: 83 – 92.
- 28.
Miller WL. Routine, ceremony, or drama: an exploratory study of the primary care clinical encounter. J Fam Pract 1992; 34: 289 – 96.
- 29.
Malterud K, Bærheim A. Peeing barbed wire. Symptom experiences in women with lower urinary tract infection. Scand J Prim Health Care 1999; 17: 49 – 51.
- 30.
Stensland P, Malterud K. New gateways to dialogue in general practice. Development of an illness diary to expand communication. Scand J Prim Health Care 1997; 15: 175 – 9.
- 31.
Whyte WF, red. Participatory action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.
- 32.
Baarts C, Tulinius C, Reventlow S. Reflexivity – a strategy for a patient-centred approach in general practice. Fam Pract 2000; 17: 430 – 4.
- 33.
Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory – procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
- 34.
Giorgi A. Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. I: Giorgi A, red. Phenomenology and psychological research. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1985: 8 – 22.
- 35.
Blaxter M. Criteria for evaluation of qualitative research. Med Sociol News 1996; 22: 68 – 71.
- 36.
Elder NC, Miller WL. Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies. J Fam Pract 1995; 41: 279 – 85.
- 37.
Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995; 311: 109 – 12.
- 38.
Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature. XXIII. Qualitative research in health care. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 2000; 284: 357 – 62.
- 39.
Chapple A, Rogers A. Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the «soft» option, or a form of sociological imperialism? Fam Pract 1998; 15: 556 – 61.
- 40.
Hamberg K, Johansson E, Lindgren G, Westman G. Scientific rigour in qualitative research – examples from a study of women’s health in family practice. Fam Pract 1994; 11: 176 – 81.
- 41.
Hammersley M. Reading ethnographic research. New York: Longman, 1990.
- 42.
Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users’ guide to the medical literature. XXIII. Qualitative research in health care. B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? JAMA 2000; 284: 478 – 82.