How we work
The first author of this article acts as project coordinator and translates or language edits article summaries that are subsequently uploaded to ScholarOne Manuscripts, the Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association's electronic system for submitting and managing manuscripts. This gives us a good overview of upcoming articles for translation and helps us to plan our work. Thought is given to which translators may have experience of a particular topic or a preference for particular types of articles. For example, some translators have a fondness for medical history articles and essays, while others have a particular interest in global health. Those with a medical or neuroscience background tend to be allocated articles in the genres Case reports, Clinical reviews, Images in medicine, and original articles, depending on the topic.
Upon receiving an article, translators will first read through the text and note any unfamiliar terminology or translation challenges arising. The reference list is very useful here, as in most cases, this is where key terminology in English will appear. However, not all material cited is accessible to the translators. Three main sources are used for background material: primary source material cited in the article, British English articles in UK medical journals, and previous translations for the Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association. Other online sources can be helpful, and other team members are also frequently consulted.
We find it very helpful that the Norwegian texts are editorially processed before we receive them, as they are always clear and well written. This greatly helps us meet the requirement for plain language in medical texts (3).
Our translators always work in pairs. This is a crucial aspect of how we work and of our quality control procedure
Our translators always work in pairs. This is a crucial aspect of how we work and of our quality control procedure, and is in line with models for medical translation quality assurance (4). The first translator sends their draft to a second, who then proofs the translation, checking it carefully against the source text, and suggests changes or improvements. These may be related to anything from terminology, to punctuation, to improving the formulation of the English sentences. The process is relatively time-consuming, but the translator and the proofreader both have a sharp eye and dedication to producing the best possible result, and they have all worked together in this way on articles for the Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association for many years. They have built up their own glossaries and added to these based on input from their colleagues.